Re: List to Father Christmas

[brsaweda(at)gmail(dot)com]

On May 22, 3:06 pm, laurent_ro(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)yahoo(dot)com (Laurent ROCHE) wrote:

(...)
> To me I don't see, the point of having the full Server ServNm (servnm:5432): ServNm is enough.

You raised a couple of interesting points. Just a quick comment here:
the port number is essential if you have several database clusters
running on different ports on the same server (as I do).

Regards
Erwin