Re: viewing tables with bytea fields in 1.2.2 and

[Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>]

Keith C. Perry wrote:


>  I would think you really can't or **probably** would not manipulate
>  byteas in pgadmin. Could there not be and option to "ignore" a bytea
>  field(s) (i.e. a placeholder or some sort) so that you can insert,
>  update, etc other record fields without having to wait for bytea
>  field data?

I'll have a look at it for 1.4postBeta3; non-editing bytea seems reasonable.

Regards,
Andreas