Re: Slony schemas

[Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>]

Dave Page wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of
> > > the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under
> > > there.
> > >
> > > Any objections to this?
> > Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)
>
> Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial
> name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.

Right now I have (for schema _cluster1): "Slony catalog (cluster1)". 
Seems sensible enough?

//Magnus