Re: SUN Studio 11 vs pgAdmin - code cleanup]

["Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>]

Hi,

Yes, I did get it, I just haven't caught up since my vacation yet.
Hopefully later today or tomorrow :-)

Thanks, Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM [mailto:Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM] 
> Sent: 21 August 2006 12:36
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: SUN Studio 11 vs pgAdmin - code cleanup]
> 
> Dave Page napsal(a):
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM [mailto:Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM] 
> >> Sent: 02 August 2006 07:33
> >> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Dave Page
> >> Subject: SUN Studio 11 vs pgAdmin - code cleanup]
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried compiled pgAdmin with the SUN Studio 11 and I found 
> >> some problem
> >> in the code. I send patch which fix two errors and lot of warnings:
> >>
> >> 1) New C++ standard brings overloaded definition of strchr 
> >> function. See
> >>    http://www.cplusplus.com/ref/cstring/strchr.html for detail.
> >>
> >> 2) Missing const in the pgCollection::FindChild method definition
> >> generate mangling problem with linking. See
> >> http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/documentation/ss11/mr/RE
> >> ADMEs/c++.html#cNameMangling
> >>
> >> 3) I removed extra ; in the code on many places.
> > 
> > Thanks - patch applied to the stable branch. Would you mind 
> taking some
> > time to port the patch to SVN TRUNK please? It's most 
> likely that that
> > will go beta within a few weeks and unfortunately I'm 
> *really* pushed
> > for time right now :-(
> 
> There is patch for the TRUNK.
> 
> 
> 	Zdenek
> 
> PS: I sent this mail on Friday, but It was not appear in the list. Is 
> everything OK with the mailing list?
> 
>