Re: Lightspeed for frmQuery and other issues.
Re: Lightspeed for frmQuery and other issues.
Dave Page wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Sent: 30/04/06 16:19:51
To: "Dave Page"<dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lightspeed for frmQuery and other issues.
It wasn't removed explicitely, but the underlying class that didn't meet
the requirement was backed out. You've painted the wall before
wallpapering it.
Quickreport sat over that class as well - is that now broken too?
That's in frmQuery only, right? If so, the local solution is fine. If
it's more global, it should go somehow to dlgClasses.
Please restore the functionality or I will back out the patch until it is completed in it's entirety.
Which functionality?
You complain about the work that led to significant speed increase from the original code, but at least we busted a gut to make sure it didn't break any existing functionality.
Again: I said early enough the base was wrong. And I didn't see *any*
speed increase on linux. Probably, any virtual solution will be ok, but
any non-virtual solution *cant* be ok.
It's not a problem of the factories, they do what they should and will
work *if used*.
Like I said, I'll look at this. I didn't grok that the failed attempt you mentioned was only a minor rejig.
It should have been, but things are horribly intervowen. I'd have to
understand in detail what's going on to continue, because apparently
removing MNU_XXX entries would kill methods too.
Regards,
Andreas
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
