Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2

["Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OpenMacNews [mailto:openmacnews(at)gmail(dot)com] 
> Sent: 27 February 2006 16:11
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due 
> to libxml2
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> On 2/27/06 Dave Page wrote:
> > Hmm, actually AC_PROG_RANLIB can go completely - I added 
> that when I 
> > was
> > playing with the build system recently but then changed tactic, but
> > obviously left that there. Similarly, I doubt you need 
> AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> > in reality.
> > 
> 
> fair nuf.  though without it, glibtoolize complains ... not 
> fatally, fwiw.

Why's it even being called? We don't create any libraries at all (and I
never saw any warnings about it on Tiger, or back when I was running
Panther).

Regards, Dave.