Re: automake

[Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>]

Dave Page wrote:
>  
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de] 
> > Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> > Subject: Re: automake
> >
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de] 
> > > > Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39
> > > > To: Dave Page
> > > > Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> > > > Subject: Re: automake
> > > >
> > > > Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a 
> > > > missing separator 
> > > > in line 377.
> > > >
> > > > automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but 
> > > > aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will 
> >
> > fail then.
> >
> > > > If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no?
> > >
> > >
> > > Eh? Do you have both installed in different locations or something?
> >
> > No, /usr/bin.
> > All versions are present, but ./bootstrap relies on 
> > aclocal/autoconf to 
> > point to the right versions.
> >
> > currently, aclocal-1.4 will run (without problem), but 
> > automake-1.9 will 
> > claim aclocal version and configure isn't created. aclocal-1.9 won't 
> > run, many errors.
>
>
> Is this OK now (following an svn update)?

I get quite some warnings from aclocal, but after rm -r config* ac*;svn 
update I'm workable again.

Regards,
Andreas