Re: New acinclude.m4

["Adam H. Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>]

On May 19, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:

> What I'm trying to say is this:
> I've a dynamic only build. So, wx-config --libs is ok. wx-config
> --static --libs gives an error.
> According to what I understand from the wx-config --help output is:
> if I had both built and would like to get informations concerning the
> static wxWid libs, then I'd need to pass --static to wx-config. Right?

Yes.  The --static flag is only useful in the case where a user has  
both a static and dynamic build of wxWidgets in the same tree.
> yup, _I HATE STATIC BUILDS TOO_ :)) But, it seems that at least for
> Florian this is important. The latest patch I sent just does two  
> things:
> a) force static parameters of wxWid, just in case the wx-config --libs
> would not give the _static_ lib informations when both shared and  
> static
> are installed on the system.

Yes, your patch would add support for those people with both build  
types.

> b) re-introduce the pg_static_build=yes variable which is later
> interpreted just as in previous versions because the old code is still
> there.

There are no references to pg_static_build in acinclude any more.   
Well, okay there's one, but it doesn't do anything because  
pg_static_build isn't set anywhere (sans your patch, of course).

Your patch is fine, just know that it terms of statically linking  
pgAdmin3 as a whole it does nothing.  It only helps any user with  
both a dynamic and static wx select the one they want.

ahp