Re: Going for Gold

[Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>]

Dave Page wrote:
>  
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of 
> > Andreas Pflug
> > Sent: 29 November 2004 10:24
> > To: pgadmin-hackers
> > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Going for Gold
> >
> > Hi friends,
> >
> > seems pgAdmin III 1.2RC is matured, should we make it Gold 
> > now? Tom Lane promised to avoid further changes to the pgsql 
> > system schema, so hopefully we won't face similar problems as 
> > with beta4->beta5 again.
> >
> > As soon as pgsql8.0 is out, we can roll 1.2.1 to update the 
> > documentation to the release version, but we shouldn't delay 
> > 1.2.0 for it.
>
>
> Sounds good to me. Are the docs/screenshots/pg docs etc up to date?

Look ok for me.
> I can probably roll it tomorrow.... (following which I'll branch for
> -patches)

Lets go! 1.3 is waiting.

Regards,
Andreas