Re: Going for Gold

["Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of 
> Andreas Pflug
> Sent: 29 November 2004 10:24
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Going for Gold
> 
> Hi friends,
> 
> seems pgAdmin III 1.2RC is matured, should we make it Gold 
> now? Tom Lane promised to avoid further changes to the pgsql 
> system schema, so hopefully we won't face similar problems as 
> with beta4->beta5 again.
> 
> As soon as pgsql8.0 is out, we can roll 1.2.1 to update the 
> documentation to the release version, but we shouldn't delay 
> 1.2.0 for it.

Sounds good to me. Are the docs/screenshots/pg docs etc up to date?

I can probably roll it tomorrow.... (following which I'll branch for
-patches)

/D